Pharaonic circumcision of girls, as it is practiced in Sudan, involves
the excision of the clitoris, the labia minora and the inner, fleshy layers
of the labia majora. The remaining outer edges of the labia majora are
then brought together so that when the wound has healed they are fused
so as to leave only a pinhole-sized opening. The resultant infibulation
is, in effect, an artificially created chastity belt of thick, fibrous
scar tissue. Urination and menstruation must thereafter be accomplished
through this remaining pinhole-sized aperture (See photo).
Figure 1. Genital area of 25-year-old woman with Pharaonic circumcision.
This surgical procedure has for thousands of years been performed ritually
but is, at present, often performed routinely in a clinic-like setting
in the urban centers on all small girls, most frequently between the ages
of 4 and 8, regardless of their social standing in the society. In the
outlying areas, the procedures are conducted in the age-old fashion, by
medically untrained midwives, without anesthesia or anti-septic. The struggling
child is simply held immobile throughout the operation, and it is obvious
that under such conditions the likelihood of hemorrhage, infection, trauma
to adjacent structures, shock from pain, urinary retention due to sepsis,
edema or scarring, and psychic trauma is extremely high.
The infibulation, even among girls who are circumcised by trained midwives
or nurses in a clinic-like setting, under only slightly more antiseptic
conditions with a locally injected analgesis to mitigate the pain, presents
tremendous health problems to the girl later on in life, if she survives
the initial trauma of the operation. Various degrees and types of urinary
obstruction are a frequent result of infibulation, and concomitant urinary
tract infections are very common in pharaonically circumcised women (Abdallah,
1982; Cook, 1979; Dareer, 1983; Huber, 1969; Laycock, 1950; Sami, 1986;
Shandall, 1967; Venin, 1975).
The onset of menstruation generally creates a tremendous problem for
the girl as the vaginal aperture is inadequate for menstrual flow, and
an infibulated virgin suffers protracted and painful periods of menstruation,
with a great deal of blockage, retention and buildup of clots behind the
infibulation. Adolescence is not a happy time for the Sudanese girl, and
depression is said by doctors to be common at this time. Girls are often
married soon after menstruation commences.
Sudan, as an Afro-Arab Islamic culture, measures the all-important honor
of its families largely by the virtue and chastity of its women. Women
are assumed to be (by nature) sexually voracious, promiscuous and unbridled
creatures, morally too weak to be entrusted with the sacred honor of the
family. Pharaonic circumcision is believed to insure this honor by not
only decreasing an excessive sexual sensitivity in them but by considerably
dampening their sex drive. Furthermore, the actual physical barrier of
the infibulation is believed to prevent rape. In small girls at least,
this is not always the case, as they are sometimes brought into medical
installations for repair of tears resulting from sexual assault. Another
widely held belief, even among the educated, is that if the clitoris is
not cropped in a young girl, it will grow to enormous size and dangle between
the legs, like a man's penis, a belief which carries with it great revulsion.
Without circumcision, a girl is simply not marriageable, and the tighter
her infibulation, the higher the bride price that can be obtained.
The role of the woman in the society is one of total submission to the
man, and her behavior must at all times reflect extreme modesty, unassailable
chastity, and a virtual withdrawal from the world outside of the home.
Even when educated women in the metropolitan areas now occasionally hold
jobs, they are not able to go out into society except under the strictest
supervision of either their husbands or some other dominant family member.
Marriages are arranged by the families, although a certain amount of
leeway is presently allowed among the more modern and educated class, so
that a young man may decide for himself which girl he wishes to marry.
And if his choice is an acceptable one to both families, the arrangements
are then made. Even without this, arranged marriages are often remarkably
successful, as measured by the satisfaction expressed by both partners.
One of the main conditions for the girl's happiness is that she is not
located away from her extended family (or clan by marriage.) In other words,
she remains in a familiar and supportive environment.
Both the bridegroom and the bride are required to play rigidly assigned
roles at the marriage ceremony. He must appear relaxed, smiling, supremely
confident, totally in control, while she must be unsmiling and present
the abjectly submissive nature of maidenly modesty. His role is the more
difficult to maintain because it masks an anxiety that he may not be able
to penetrate her infibulation, that he will cause her to hemorrhage in
the attempt (and perhaps even see her die), or that his anxiety will cause
erectile dysfunction which would be so devastating to his manhood that
he may actually commit suicide as a consequence.
Her withdrawn, unresponsive expression is far closer to the truth and
hides an abject terror of what is in store for her. The penetration of
the bride's infibulation takes anywhere from 3 or 4 days to several months.
Some men are unable to penetrate their wives at all (in my study over 15%),
and the task is often accomplished by a midwife under conditions of great
secrecy, since this reflects negatively on the man's potency. Some who
are unable to penetrate their wives manage to get them pregnant in spite
of the infibulation, and the woman's vaginal passage is then cut open to
allow birth to take place. A great deal of marital anal intercourse takes
place in cases where the wife can not be penetrated-- quite logically in
a culture where homosexual anal intercourse is a commonly accepted premarital
recourse among men-but this is not readily discussed. Those men who do
manage to penetrate their wives do so often, or perhaps always, with the
help of the "little knife." This creates a tear which they gradually rip
more and more until the opening is sufficient to admit the penis. In some
women, the scar tissue is so hardened and overgrown with keloidal formations
that it can only be cut with very strong surgical scissors, as is reported
by doctors who relate cases where they broke scalpels in the attempt.
Clearly, the Sudanese bride undergoes conditions of tremendous pain,
as well as physical and psychic trauma. These were always readily spoken
of by women, generally with a great deal of easily expressed affect, when
they were speaking to a female interviewer. Paradoxically, most women related
that their husbands were considerate and loving throughout the ordeal,
and that they are sensitive and tender lovers. A far smaller number of
women said that their husbands had been brutal.
Sudanese couples tend to bond quite strongly, by and large, in spite
of the trauma the woman undergoes. Most women give the appearance of being
very proud of their husbands. They often express great satisfaction with
their marriages and their lives. Nonetheless, when they are asked whether
they would have preferred to have been men, rather than women, they say
without any exception that if only Allah had willed it, they would very
much have preferred to have been created men.
The Sudanese, in general, are a remarkably open, friendly, peaceable,
mutually supportive, generous, deeply devout people, who, to the Western
mind, are inexplicably happy in their desperately poor, monotonously barren,
harsh and bleakly desertized land. Their emotional lives, from childhood
on, are quite remarkably rich, as Sudanese psychiatrists will also verify,
and loving relationships are plentiful in their widely extended families.
They are deeply convinced of the infiniteness and mercy of Allah, and they
practice the obligations imposed by their religion fervently and with great
joy. The rule of custom is powerful and all-pervading and is accepted by
the populace without question.
The rigidly defined roles for men and women instill the belief that
in order to fulfill the masculine role, the bridegroom must inflict pain,
and the woman in her role must suffer it. With this in mind, it is not
in-consistent for a strong bonding to take place, in spite of the pain
that is inflicted on a bride by her bridegroom, since it is seen as their
lot in life. In talking about this part of their marital lives, women often
said that their penetration was terrible, agonizingly painful, and frequently
resulted in hemorrhage or prolonged infection, but that when it was finally
over, the wife forgave her husband, and they were happy together.
Although the consequences of Pharaonic circumcision render many women
sterile, it is far more common for them to give birth to a 1arge number
of children. Since no infibulated woman, even after she has been penetrated
for sexual intercourse, can dilate the necessary 10 centimeters to permit
birth to take place, her infibulation scar must be cut anteriorly before
the baby can be expelled. The necessary incision generally measures 2½
-3 inches and is repaired after birth occurs.
In recent years, a curious modification of this procedure has occurred.
Instead of the vaginal opening being resutured to the size that it was
before the Infibulation was incised for birth to take place, women are
now being resewn to a pinhole-sized opening. This "repair" is called "recircumcision."
The practice was unknown in Sudan only 50 years ago, and among the interviewed
women who were over 65 years of age, it has never been performed. The author
assumes that the practice is a bastardization of the Western vaginal tuck
procedure, since it was first practiced by educated upper-class women with
exposure to the West and has gradually filtered down from the capital into
more and more remote areas and to women who have little or no education
(Dareer, 1982. p.58).
Although Dareer (1982), a Sudanese researcher who interviewed an extensive
cross-section of the Sudanese population, also reports that it is now performed
on the greater majority of Sudanese women, it is difficult to get accurate
information on the real impetus behind it. Midwives, who profitably tout
and perform the procedure, tend to say that it is men who pay generously
for it, and women concur that it is all done for the pleasure of the man.
Some educated women, however, frankly admit that the procedure makes the
most of what is left of their damaged genital musculature and facilitates
their own pleasure as well, once the pain of the then-necessary penetration
is over. There is also the characteristically Sudanese notion of renewable
virginity and a reassertion of the husband's role of male dominance which
requires him to inflict pain on his bride. Behind it all, there is the
irrefutable fact that without a tight repair, the condition of the woman's
sex organs (sooner or later) makes her an ostensibly inadequate sex partner.
This is a source of great anxiety to all women, as multiple marriage is
permitted to the Islamic man, and a wife fears having to share with another
wife not only her husband, hut also his very limited economic resources.
The reconstitution of a pinhole-sized vaginal opening is thought to insure
the wife's position by providing her husband with a "virginal" vagina once
more. After a six-week period of abstinence following birth prescribed
by the religion, the woman submits once more to a period of repenetration.
Circumcised women, in general, and uneducated village women, in particular,
give every indication (also often reported by non-Sudanese men) of being
enviably intact in terms of sexual "lustiness," in spite of their mutilation,
quite contrary to the intent of circumcision to reduce their sexual drive.
Sudanese women are culturally bound to hide their "lustiness," and so they
skillfully navigate between the demands of custom and their husbands and
the demands of their own sexuality. They do so by means of a series of
maneuvers and sex signals. Custom places severe penalties on a woman's
initiation or even show of interest in sexual intercourse. However, the
use of the "smoke ceremony" is known to every Sudanese woman, and to every
Sudanese man as well. Practically every woman uses this ceremony. She signals
her desire and receptivity by permeating her skin with the smoke of burning
spices, sandalwood, frankincense and myrrh. She squats naked over the embers,
wrapped in a tentlike robe, so that her skin absorbs the volatile oils,
and afterwards rubs generous quantities of fat into her skin to fix them.
Moorehead (1962, p.234) quotes Baker (the 19th- Century explorer as commenting
that he could smell a woman who had performed this ceremony a hundred yards
away, and my own experiences bear this out.
The intent of the signal is dearly understood by every Sudanese husband,
and he acts upon it with no verbalization or other act of agreement being
needed. The wife can now behave in a way that totally negates her intent.
She can act out the role of the ravaged one while he acts out the role
of the ravisher, or she can be dutifully acquiescent to her husband's sexual
demands while giving the appearance of having no interest or pleasure whatsoever
herself.
Other covert sexual initiatives are also permitted. I was told by several
women that if their husbands did not respond to their signals, or if the
sexual activity was desired by them during the night, they would bang pots
and pans around to wake their husbands. After this had had the desired
effect, the husband would be able to resume his sleep.
Custom decrees that a Sudanese woman remain totally passive during the
sex act. She must lie like a block of wood and participate in no way whatsoever.
She must exhibit this unnatural immobility, for her being sexually active
would be regarded as "being like an animal." Only such immobility will
enable her to manifest the demands of modesty imposed on her.
If the woman has an orgasm, she hides it, and if she is unable to control
the intensity of her reaction, she denies that it was brought on as sexual
ecstasy. One woman, who told me she had frequent, intense orgasms, commented
that she "moved about a great deal during intercourse" and that she had
given her husband to understand that this was the case because she liked
to change position frequently.
Even though women generally do not admit to their husbands that they
experience sexual pleasure and orgasm (in spite of the fact that some men
tell them they would like them to do so), most men say they know when their
wife's orgasm takes place. Nonetheless, the wife's outright initiation
of or active participation in the sex act is grounds for immediate and
incontestable divorce. Many women are able to relate at least one case
where they know of such an outcome. Thus, the possibility is much feared.
A woman who gives herself away by showing interest and pleasure openly
is condemned as being licentious, lewd, and of easy virtue, and she is
dealt with accordingly.
How is orgasm possible at all under such conditions? Contrary to expectations,
nearly 90% of all women interviewed said that they experienced orgasm (climax)
or had at various periods of their marriage experienced it. Frequency ranged
from always to rarely. Some women said that they had intense, prolonged
orgasms, and this was verified by their happy and highly animated demeanor
as they described it. Other women said that their orgasms were weak or
difficult to achieve. Frequently, intractible pain, a residual of the circumcision,
prevented orgasm altogether. Sometimes, anorgasmia was the probable result
of an unhappy marriage. Among the anorgasmic women, some were educated
upper-class women who had become aware of orgasmic uncircumcised women
in other parts of the world. They were full of rage at what had been done
to them. They said that, although they loved their husbands as human beings,
they could feel no sexual desire for them or any other men.
Sudanese men of the upper strata who have had sexual experiences with
Western women (or with women from African countries where less drastic
or no circumcision procedures are practiced) are of the opinion that "Sudanese
women lose a lot." They concur that orgasm in Sudanese women, as they perceive
it, is weaker, less frequent, and takes longer to elicit. The delay in
arousal time is believed by Bakr (1982) to be the result of the vulval
nerve destruction. The perception that orgasm occurs less frequently and
is less intense must, however, be interpreted cautiously in the context
of the culture in which it occurs, where women need to hide their sexual
response. While the orgasm of a woman may be detected by her partner, the
purity of the experience itself is subjective, and its intensity can be
perceived only by the woman herself.
Among doctors interviewed, several reported having had patients, especially
among the educated, who expressed the fear that they were not sexually
adequate for their husband's needs. Many of these women paradoxically suffered
guilt that they were not able to function better sexually. It is a point
of honor for men to have a child born within a year of marriage. Gynecologists
report that there is an increasing number of women who come to the clinics
in the capital with sexual and marital problems related to fertility. They
are concerned with their lack of sensation and response and are afraid
that this will prevent them from becoming pregnant. They are aware, in
any event, that "things are not as they should be."
The subject of orgasm among circumcised African women has been discussed
in a number of studies (Karim & Ammar, 1965, Megafu, 1983; Shandall,
1967). Although only 27% of Dareer's 2,375 Sudanese women (1982, p.48)
admitted to having "sexual pleasure," Assaad's study (1982) in Egypt found
that 94% of the 54 circumcised women interviewed by her reported that they
enjoyed sex and were happy with their husbands. Giorgis (1981, p.31) comments
that the correlation between female circumcision and lack of sexual satisfaction
has been grossly exaggerated. She quotes Verzin (1975. p.167) as a representative
of the misconceptions that are common on this score: "Lack of sexual gratification
appears to be common, the absence of the clitoris probably playing a part
in this. The information is never volunteered and very rarely admitted.
A blank expression, an enigmatic smile or at most an evasive reply towards
a curious question, and this is irrespective of color, creed or sex of
the questioner. In such a society, the woman is regarded as a vassal for
man's pleasure and subsequently the hearer of his offspring. It is probable
that maany are not even aware that there should be reciprocal enjoyment."
The behavior described herein is typical of women who hide their sexual
enjoyment, especially from a male interviewer. Sami (1986), in discussing
his study of female circumcision in Sudan, also complains that "people's
reluctance to discuss the subject makes the task of collecting reliable
information extremely difficult."
My own facility in collecting more accurate data came about through
the use of a number of devices. I preceded my question on sexual enjoyment
with the question on whether a woman used the smoke and oil ceremony. She
nearly always readily admitted to this, and once it had become clear that
I understood its meaning, communication between us generally became easy,
especially when I offered to reciprocate by answering whatever questions
she had about my own personal life. This offer, coming from a woman who
obviously lived a different (and no doubt fascinating) lifestyle to the
Sudanese nearly always proved to be irresistible. Sudanese women also appeared
to feel that I posed no threat.
I suggest, therefore, that the differences in findings of the various
studies are, in part, a function of the differences in the interview situations.
Primarily, the interviewer's gender, approach, and ease with which sexual
matters could be discussed all play a part.
Sudanese psychiatrists theorized that the various crippling effects
of Pharaonic circumcision can be counteracted only by an unusually strong
bonding between marriage partners. In the opinion of most, the sexual response
of Sudanese women is largely nothing more than a kind of stereotypic response.
However, Sudanese psychiatrists (who are male) also admit that they are
in a poor position to judge because of their gender and because female
patients are rarely brought to them. They do think, however, that since
orgasm entails both cerebral as well as muscular responses, and involves
also respiratory and vascular reactions, the physiological phenomena are
present but damaged or lessened in circumcised women. In compensation,
they suggest that the cerebral component may be heightened.
In the literature, orgasm in clitoridectomized females is mentioned
by Money et al. (1955) and by Verkauf (1975). Megafu (1988) observed that,
whereas the clitoris tends to be reported as the most erotically sensitive
organ in uncircumcised women, other sensitive parts of the body, such as
the labia minora, the breasts and the lips take over this erotic function
in clitoridectomized females. Perhaps as Otto (1988) suggests, women are
capable of experiencing 7 distinct types of orgasm: the clitoral, vaginal/cervical,
breast, oral, G-spot, anal and mental orgasm. Similarly, Ogden (1988) reports
on extragenital stimulation, emotional involvement and spiritual connection
in easily orgasmic women, whereas orgasms have also long been reported
by practitioners of tantric yoga.
When asked to name the most sensitive parts of their body, Sudanese
women tended to name their lips, neck, breasts, bellies, thighs or hips.
The genitalia were never spontaneously mentioned. This is due, at least
in part, to the fact that a virtuous and modest Sudanese woman is required
to never speak of that part of her body. When the genitalia were addressed
directly by the question "What about the area of your scar?," and following
that, "What about inside?," erogeneity of one or the other (or of both
areas) was admitted, or even glowingly described by many women. Others
had little or no erogeneity and said things like: "With the Pharaonic,
you can not really feel your man. Everything is closed," or more drastically:
"It is as if your husband comes with a stick to leather."
In the interviews, women were able to talk freely and lucidly about
their orgasms. To the question: "How often do you experience orgasm?" (to
be used interchangeably here with "climax," which was more readily understood),
the following responses were representative:
"We have intercourse every two or three days. I never have
orgasm during the first time, even though my husband maintains an erection
for 45 minutes or an hour. When we have intercourse a second time, about
an hour later, I am able to reach orgasm."
"With my first husband, I almost never had any pleasure, and I had
orgasm only a handful of times over the years. It was an arranged marriage,
and although he was a kind man and good to me, I did not have any passion
for him. My second marriage is a love match and I always have strong orgasm
with him, except on rare occasions, when I am too tired or one of the children
is sick."
"When I was younger, I used to have it happen 9 times out of 10. Now
there are so many children and grandchildren in the house that we can have
intercourse only every second or third week. We have so little privacy,
and we have to be very quiet about it. Also, I have had frequent problems
with urinary infections. When we have intercourse, I am able to come to
orgasm once in a while now, perhaps 1 time in 10."
"I have never had any pleasure from my husband. I try to avoid sex
with him whenever I can. It is not that he is brutal or that we do not
love one another. It would be the same no matter whom I was married to.
The only thing I ever feel there is pain. I am happy when he lets me go
to sleep and does not bother me."
Descriptions of orgasm were clearly recognizable and often quite vivid.
"I feel as if I am trembling in my belly. It feels like shock
going around my body, very sweet and pleasurable. When it finishes1 I feel
as if I would faint."
"All my body begins to tingle. Then I have a shock to my pelvis and
my legs. It gets very tight in my vagina. I have a tremendous feeling of
pleasure, and I can not move at all. I seem to be flying far, far up. Then
my whole body relaxes and I go completely limp."
"I feel as if I am losing all consciousness, and I love him most intensely
at that moment. I tremble all over. My vagina contracts strongly and I
have a feeling of great joy. Then I relax all over, and I am so happy to
be alive and to be married to my husband."
"I feel shivery and want to swallow him inside my body. Then a very
sweet feeling spreads all over my entire body, and I feel as if I am melting.
I float higher and higher, far, far away. Then I drift off to sleep."
"I feel as if I am losing all consciousness, it is such a strong feeling.
I hold my husband very, very tightly, and if the baby fell out of the bed.
I would not be able to pick it up."
A primary factor in orgasm appears to be the bonding between couples.
This is dramatically illustrated by the accounts given by a few women who
have been married twice and whose experiences in the two separate marriages
have been significantly different. Some of these histories are presented
herein.
History #1:
This 24-year old practical nurse comes from a village in western
Sudan, where circumcision practices are at their most extreme. She has
had 5 years of education. Her Pharaonic circumcision was performed at the
age of 4, and she remembers very little of the experience except that she
cried a great deal. However, she began to menstruate at the age of 12,
and her periods were consistently very difficult and painful for ten days
each month until her arranged marriage at 16.
In the village where she lived, custom demanded that the bridegroom
penetrate his bride in one night, and a great deal of peer pressure was
placed on him. The experience was so brutal that she was terrified of him
for half a year afterward. Then, as he was quite gentle with her following
this initial trauma, she adapted to a degree. She was never able to enjoy
sex with this husband, however, and continually implored her family to
arrange a divorce for her. This was done after the birth of a son, when
she was 17. She was "recircumcised" to make her ready for a second marriage,
but this time a 1-2 centimeter opening was left.
She was remarried to a man she had loved since childhood. There was
only one day of moderate pain in repenetrating her. He is patient and gentle,
she says, and she feels secure and loved with him. Also, she has a strong
orgasm with him about one-third of the time. She enjoys being kissed and
has a highly pleasurable feeling of "shock" in her lips. She also enjoys
having her scar stroked. The strongest sensation is experienced at the
contact of his penis with her cervix, and her orgasm, when it occurs, is
precipitated by his ejaculation. She has strong vaginal pulsations and
says she feels as if she were under sedation. Orgasm occurs after about
20 minutes of intercourse. The other two thirds of the time she is unable
to climax, even when intercourse is prolonged or repeated. Her body is
simply too tired on those occasions, she states. Still, she feels happy
and relaxed afterwards just from the contact with his body. There is "a
slight feeling of disappointment," but she realizes that "it has to be
that way," that her body "simply can not respond more often than it does."
Even though communication is very open between her and her husband,
and he cares deeply about keeping her sexually happy (and happy in all
other ways), she is too shy to initiate intercourse directly. She has been
strongly indoctrinated that this would be extremely shameful, and so she
resorts to the use of smoke and perfumed oil when she wants to let him
know that she is receptive.
Unfortunately, this woman has recently been forced to separate from
her husband because of an intractable conflict with her mother-in-law.
She now lives with her own family again, and she and her husband miss one
another acutely. They meet at her sister's house, but no privacy is possible
there. Her mother-in-law is adamant that her husband divorce her, but he
has refused to do this so far.
History #2:
This 32-year-old practical nurse has had 9 years of education.
Her Pharaonic circumcision occurred at the age of twelve and was performed
with the use of local analgesic by a medically trained midwife in the capital.
She says that she was able to urinate almost immediately after the operation,
a fairly unusual occurrence (due to the rawness of the wounded area, and
that she remembers only two hours of severe pain after the operation. She
resumed her normal activities after 10 days.
She began to menstruate at 16 and suffered a great deal of pain from
obstruction of her menstrual flow until she was married at 17. On the fourth
day of her marriage, her husband succeeded in creating a tear in her infibulation
which bled profusely. Two days later, he enlarged this tear, which by that
time bled so much that she had to be taken to a dispensary for treatment.
The bleeding was stopped, but her husband was told to continue in his attempts
to penetrate her so that she would not heal shut again. After two more
weeks, he succeeded in penetrating her completely, and after 15 more days
of pain, she said, "Things were normal."
She did not love this husband. He was a distant relative, and the marriage
had been arranged without her consent. He drank a great deal (an extremely
rare occurrence among Islamic men) and was often abusive. She did not enjoy
sexual relations with him because he was rough and entered her without
any preparation. He was involved in subversive politics and spent much
of the ten years that she was married to him as a political prisoner. Finally,
he left Sudan for Saudi Arabia and was not permitted to return. Subsequently,
her family obtained a divorce for her. She did not miss him at all, she
says. She feels that he had treated her very badly.
Her marriage to her present husband took place a few months after her
divorce. As is customary with every new marriage, she was once more infibulated.
Penetration took two months to achieve, and her husband was patient, loving,
considerate and supportive throughout. She says that she is extremely happy
in this marriage. They love one another passionately, and she has an extremely
enjoyable sex life. She absolutely glows with happiness as she speaks about
it. She also has strong orgasm every time they have intercourse, and her
breasts, mouth, inner thighs, and scar area are very sensitive. Greatest
sensitivity is inside her vagina. She never directly initiates intercourse
but signals receptivity almost every night with smoke and perfumed oil.
History #3:
This 39-year-old medically trained midwife has had seven years
of education. She was circumcised at the age of 8. She remembers nothing
about the event but has been told that she bled massively. This may be
the reason that her outer labia were left intact. Her clitoris and inner
labia were excised and she was infibulated to a pin-hole. She had the "usual
difficulties with menstruation" from its onset at the age of 12 until her
first delivery.
She was married at 13. Her husband was unable to penetrate her and only
after three years succeeded in impregnating her. When she gave birth, her
infibulation was cut open by the midwife. She loved her husband very much.
The sexual adjustment between them was excellent, she recalls wistfully.
They had intercourse almost daily, and she consistently enjoyed strong
orgasm with him. The marriage lasted for 20 years. Then economic pressures
forced him to take a job in Saudi Arabia, and there he simply disappeared
without a trace. After two years, and a fruitless search for him, her family
divorced her from him through the courts. She continued to wait for him,
but he was never heard from again and is presumed to have died.
Her husband had cared very much about her feelings and her sexual happiness.
She had strong sensation inside her vagina, and also some Sensation in
the area of her scar, although it was less there because of the circumcision,
but it was still pleasant. Whereas he never gave her a chance to initiate
sex because he wanted her constantly, she felt so secure with him that
she might possibly have done so. She laughed happily as she recalled this.
She hardly ever refused his advances, only when she was really sick. She
played her role of being shy and having intercourse only for his pleasure,
but she loved it, and he saw through her pretense completely and loved
her for it.
After some years, her family arranged a second marriage to an older,
widowed neighbor. She was reinfibulated to a l-centimeter opening, and
repenetration was accomplished in three weeks. After another three weeks,
she had no further pain. He is a gentle man and very good to her and her
children, but "Sex does not matter one way or the other." She has intercourse
only because it is her duty, almost never reaches orgasm, and "Then it
is only a shadow."